Hey fellow
bloggers!
With more
and more people moving into cities around the world, the question rises what
the consequences will be. Studies show that in 2008, for the first time in
history, more than half the world’s population was living in towns and cities.
This ongoing urbanization is often
described as an endless cycle: as cities develop more opportunities, they
attract more people, who then contribute to the development of the city, which
in its turn will attract more people. So where are we headed?
Bad
for the environment? Yes! But in what way?
The first thing
people immediately think about is the rise of smog-levels. It is undeniable
that having more citizens also means having more traffic and everybody knows cars
are bad for the environment. I think we’ve all seen the images of Mexico City
or Shanghai, shrouded in smoky fog. China even had to cancel all traffic in
Beijing during the summer of 2008 in an attempt to clean the air for the
Olympics.
But
according to environmentalists, the smog isn’t the biggest problem of growing
urbanization. They fear that the expansion of cement-dominated urban centres will have a detrimental impact on the
biodiversity.
The cup is half-full
Of course,
no one is saying that cities are actually good for the environment, but they
aren’t necessarily as bad as people make them out to be. We have to be
realistic, in our growing economy, our life is increasingly defined within an
urban context, so why not make the best of it while we can?
Do you
believe that people can adopt the right attitude and help save what’s left of
the biodiversity, or do you think this is just another theory that cannot be
put into practice?
Emmeline,
Marjoke and Sophie
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten